benchmark-to-brief
Turn existing benchmark reports, pattern tables, or audience evidence into grounded campaign briefs, concepts, hooks, and test plans.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/postplusai/postplus-skills --skill benchmark-to-briefSKILL.md
Benchmark To Brief
Use When
- Turn validated benchmark research into campaign briefs, concept candidates, hook libraries, lane priorities, or test matrices.
- Use after research already exists; this is the strategy handoff between evidence and execution.
Do Not Use When
- The task is greenfield brainstorming without source evidence.
- The user needs final scripts; return a script-ready brief and send it to the human script review gate.
- The user needs visual generation; hand off to asset generation workflows after the evidence-backed brief exists.
Required Input
- Validated evidence such as benchmark reports, master tables, pattern tables, strategy tables, comment analyses, or performance findings.
- For the structured artifact, input JSON with
corePromise,hookOptions,workflow,sourceFacts, andsourceBasis.
Fact Rule
Everything produced by this skill must be grounded in available evidence.
Do not invent:
- target personas with no source basis
- hooks that contradict benchmark wording
- unsupported product claims
- audience motivations not reflected in data
If evidence is incomplete, separate:
Observed from sourcesInferenceOpen question
Default Workflow
- Use the smallest sufficient evidence set already supplied or explicitly identified by the user.
- Prefer structured artifacts first: final report, strategy table, pattern table, master table, then comment summaries.
- Extract facts before proposing: winning lanes, repeated hook shells, repeated structure types, visual format tendencies, user-language patterns, and strong examples.
- Map facts to brief fields: source artifact, benchmark ids or examples, why the pattern fits the product, and variable being tested.
- Keep each concept narrow: one problem, one hook family, one format, one test variable.
- Preserve benchmark language when adapting hooks unless the user asks for variant testing.
- Return an execution object: brief, concept list, hook set, script input, or approved copy.
Judgment Flow
For every recommendation, answer:
- what problem is being cut?
- what hook shell is being reused?
- what content lane does it belong to?
- what variable is being tested?
- which source evidence supports it?
- what claim or audience motivation is only inference?
Stop Conditions
- Stop when required user intent, source evidence, or owned input artifacts are missing and guessing would change the result.
Output Shape
Common outputs:
- campaign brief
- concept candidates
- hook library
- lane prioritization
- AB test matrix
Campaign brief fields:
objectivepriorityLanespersonaConstraintsapprovedHookFamiliesprohibitedDirectionsvariablesToTestsourceBasis
Concept candidate fields:
conceptIdproblemToCuthookTypehookDrafttargetLaneformatTypewhyThisFitssourceBasistestVariable
Anti-Patterns
- vague ideas like "make a productivity video"
- copying benchmark content without adapting the concrete product variable
- rewriting concrete benchmark language into abstract brand claims
- treating raw research as execution-ready without a brief or concept object
- passing raw research directly into publishing
Handoff
- Return the structured output or an explicit evidence blocker. Hand off only explicit execution objects to script review, asset generation workflows, or content packaging.
Public Command Boundary
- Choose the smallest matching command or workflow from the user input and run it directly.
Related skills
reddit-automationflowkit-labs682KFind Reddit threads where people are genuinely asking for what you offer, then draft short, genuinely helpful replies — disclosing your affiliation honestly and naming your product only when it truly answers the question. Two moves: discovery — scan the right subreddits for real needs (recommendation asks, expressed pain, competitor mentions) and rank the few threads where you can actually help; drafting — write from real experience, respect each community's self-promo rules, and keep a human intwitter-automation101-skills547KAutomate Twitter/X with posting, engagement, and user management via inference.sh CLI. Apps: x/post-tweet, x/post-create (with media), x/post-like, x/post-retweet, x/dm-send, x/user-follow. Capabilities: post tweets, schedule content, like posts, retweet, send DMs, follow users, get profiles. Use for: social media automation, content scheduling, engagement bots, audience growth, X API. Triggers: twitter api, x api, tweet automation, post to twitter, twitter bot, social media automation, x automatwitter-automationqu-skills289KAutomate Twitter/X with posting, engagement, and user management via inference.sh CLI. Apps: x/post-tweet, x/post-create (with media), x/post-like, x/post-retweet, x/dm-send, x/user-follow. Capabilities: post tweets, schedule content, like posts, retweet, send DMs, follow users, get profiles. Use for: social media automation, content scheduling, engagement bots, audience growth, X API. Triggers: twitter api, x api, tweet automation, post to twitter, twitter bot, social media automation, x automaseo-auditcoreyhaines31216KWhen the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help wit