Code Review
863 skills.
Browse
clojure-writemetabase1.9KGuide Clojure and ClojureScript development using REPL-driven workflow, coding conventions, and best practices. Use when writing, developing, or refactoring Clojure/ClojureScript code.item-managementdotnet1.9KPatterns for managing MSBuild item groups: Include/Remove/Update semantics, item metadata, batching with %(Metadata), transforms, per-item filtering, and cross-product batching pitfalls. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing item group anti-patterns in .csproj files, reviewing item management for correctness, fixing CS2002 duplicate file warnings from SDK globbing, fixing targets that run more times than expected due to cross-product batching, fixing Include vs Update misuse on SDK-globbed items, fixinclojure-reviewmetabase1.9KReview Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.clean-architecturecodewithmukesh1.9KClean Architecture for .NET applications. Covers the 4-project layout (Domain, Application, Infrastructure, Api), dependency inversion, use case handlers, domain entities with behavior, and infrastructure as a plugin. Load this skill when building a project with Clean Architecture, discussing layered architecture, dependency inversion, use cases, or when the architecture-advisor recommends Clean Architecture.correctness-and-error-handlingcognitedata1.9KMUST be used whenever fixing correctness and error handling issues in a Flows app. This skill finds AND fixes bugs, missing error states, unhandled rejections, and edge-case failures — it does not just report them. Triggers: correctness, error handling, bug fix, edge case, crash, unhandled, null, undefined, empty state, loading state, error boundary, try catch, async error, useEffect cleanup, type guard, runtime error, robustness.no-commentscursor1.9KSpawn Comment Sicko, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.6verityjihe5201.9K数学建模竞赛最终验证和验收阶段，支持 Typst 和 LaTeX 双引擎。用于论文写完后检查章节数量、标题顺序、图表引用、数值一致性、占位符、内部文件泄露、参考文献、代码可复现性、编译和提交就绪状态。thermoscursor1.9KLaunch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.swift-concurrency-expertdimillian1.9KSwift Concurrency review and remediation for Swift 6.2+. Use when asked to review Swift Concurrency usage, improve concurrency compliance, or fix Swift concurrency compiler errors in a feature or file. Concrete actions include adding Sendable conformance, applying @MainActor annotations, resolving actor isolation warnings, fixing data race diagnostics, and migrating completion handlers to async/await.gitnexus-impact-analysisabhigyanpatwari1.9KUse when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: \"Is it safe to change X?\", \"What depends on this?\", \"What will break?\"repomix-exploreryamadashy1.8KAnalyze or explore a codebase (remote or local repository) by packing it with the Repomix CLI, then reading and searching the generated output. Use when the user wants a high-level understanding of an unfamiliar or large repo, not a targeted edit. Trigger for: - Structure/overview: "analyze this repo", "what's the structure", "explain this codebase", "what's in vercel/next.js" - Pattern discovery across many files: "find all auth code", "where are the API endpoints", "show me all React componentdddcodewithmukesh1.8KDomain-Driven Design tactical patterns for .NET applications. Covers aggregates, aggregate roots, value objects, domain events, domain services, strongly-typed IDs, and repository patterns for aggregate persistence. Load this skill when implementing DDD, working with aggregates, value objects, domain events, bounded contexts, or when the architecture-advisor recommends DDD + Clean Architecture. Pair with the clean-architecture skill.accessibility-auditowl-listener1.8KAudit an existing interface against WCAG, producing findings with severity ratings and remediation steps. Use when you have a design or build to assess now. Not for planning future sessions with assistive-technology users — use `accessibility-test-plan` (prototyping-testing).domain-modelingpandoscope1.8KBuild and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision, or when another skill needs to maintain the domain model.architecture-advisorcodewithmukesh1.8KArchitecture selection advisor for .NET applications. Asks structured questions about domain complexity, team size, system lifetime, compliance, and integration needs, then recommends the best-fit architecture: Vertical Slice, Clean Architecture, DDD + Clean Architecture, or Modular Monolith. Load this skill when the user asks "which architecture", "choose architecture", "set up project", "new project", "architecture decision", "restructure", or "how should I organize". Always load BEFORE any arsqlalchemy-alembic-expert-best-practices-code-reviewwispbit-ai1.8KSQLAlchemy ORM and Alembic migration best practices for building safe, performant database schemas. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring SQLAlchemy models, Alembic migrations, or database query patterns. Triggers on tasks involving SQLAlchemy ORM, Alembic migrations, database schema changes, or query optimization.code-simplifiersimonwong1.8KSimplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise.gitnexus-exploringabhigyanpatwari1.8KUse when the user asks how code works, wants to understand architecture, trace execution flows, or explore unfamiliar parts of the codebase. Examples: \"How does X work?\", \"What calls this function?\", \"Show me the auth flow\"nodejs-coremcollina1.8KContributes to and debugs Node.js core, including nodejs/node commit and PR tone, contribution workflows, native crashes, V8 performance, node-gyp builds, N-API bindings, and libuv issues. Use when drafting or reviewing a Node.js core commit or pull request, working in nodejs/node, or diagnosing C++ addons, binding.gyp failures, segfaults, native leaks, V8 deoptimizations, and event-loop internals.alan-review-prsupatest-ai1.8KReview a GitHub pull request using Alan's GitHub MCP toolsde-sloppifycodewithmukesh1.8KSystematic code cleanup pipeline for .NET projects. Runs 7 ordered steps: formatting, unused usings, analyzer warnings, dead code removal, TODO resolution, sealed class audit, and CancellationToken propagation. Each step is verified independently with tests between phases. Load this skill when: "clean up", "de-sloppify", "tidy up", "remove dead code", "code cleanup", "housekeeping", "tech debt", "fix warnings", "seal classes", "add CancellationToken", "unused usings", "format code".health-checkcodewithmukesh1.8KMulti-dimensional health assessment for .NET projects with letter grades (A-F) using Roslyn MCP tools. Evaluates 8 dimensions: build health, code quality, architecture, test coverage, dead code, API surface, security posture, and documentation. Produces a structured report card with actionable recommendations. Load this skill when: "health check", "how healthy is this", "project health", "code quality report", "grade this project", "assess codebase", "quality audit", "technical assessment", "codconvention-learnercodewithmukesh1.8KDetects and enforces project-specific coding conventions by analyzing existing codebase patterns. Learns naming conventions, folder structure, test organization, and coding style from the existing code. Load when: "conventions", "coding standards", "project patterns", "enforce style", "detect patterns", "learn conventions", "code consistency".code-reviewcodewithmukesh1.8KMCP-powered multi-dimensional code review for .NET projects. Uses Roslyn analysis tools for antipatterns, diagnostics, references, and dependency graphs combined with structured manual review. Prioritizes effort with blast-radius scoring — data access, security, concurrency, and integration boundaries before style — and produces severity-categorized findings with actionable fixes. Use when: "review", "code review", "PR review", "review this", "review my code", "check code quality", "review changcode-qualitytursodatabase1.8KGeneral Correctness rules, Rust patterns, comments, avoiding over-engineering. When writing code always take these into accountmapbox-style-qualitymapbox1.8KExpert guidance on validating, optimizing, and ensuring quality of Mapbox styles through validation, accessibility checks, and optimization. Use when preparing styles for production, debugging issues, or ensuring map quality standards.verifycodewithmukesh1.8KRun a comprehensive 7-phase verification pipeline for .NET projects: build, analyzers, antipattern detection, tests, security, formatting, and diff review. Each phase produces PASS/FAIL with actionable output and the pipeline short-circuits on critical failures. Also the authority on verification strategy: which phases to run for a given change, quality gates, and fix-and-retry loops. Use when: "verify", "check everything", "is this ready", "pre-PR check", "run all checks", "quality gate", "veridifit-reviewyoshiko-pg1.7KA skill for reviewing a specific diff and showing the findings as comments inside difit (the diff viewer). Use it to review branch diffs, commit diffs, or GitHub PRs, then preload findings or code explanations into difit with `--comment` before launching it for the user.arch-checkcodewithmukesh1.7KArchitecture conformance check: verifies an existing codebase against its declared architecture (VSA, Clean Architecture, DDD, Modular Monolith) — dependency direction, layer violations, module boundary leaks, and cycles — using token-cheap Roslyn MCP analysis. Invoke when: "check architecture", "architecture violations", "layer violations", "dependency direction", "module boundaries", "arch check", "is my architecture clean", "enforce architecture", "conformance check". For CHOOSING an architecpr-reviewminimax-ai1.7KReview pull requests for the MiniMax Skills repository. Use when reviewing PRs, validating new skill submissions, or checking existing skills for compliance. Run the validation script first for hard checks, then apply quality guidelines for content review. Triggers: PR review, pull request, validate skill, check skill.om-code-reviewopen-mercato1.7KReview a diff, branch, or PR against correctness, security, breaking-change, and quality standards — runs the validation gate, applies the built-in checklist plus any repo-local one, and produces severity-ranked findings with an approve/request-changes verdict. The review engine behind om-auto-review-pr and om-review-prs.woocommerce-code-reviewwoocommerce1.7KReview WooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance. Use when reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality.diffity-reviewnilbuild1.7KReview current diff and leave comments using diffity agent commandsvalidate-implementation-planb-mendoza1.7KAudits an implementation plan for requirements traceability, avoidable complexity, risky assumptions, and evidence gaps. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or human-authored plan, design proposal, implementation outline, task breakdown, or architecture plan and the user wants a standalone audit report without overwriting the source plan.diffity-resolvenilbuild1.7KRead open review comments and resolve them by making code fixesgitnexus-refactoringabhigyanpatwari1.7KUse when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: \"Rename this function\", \"Extract this into a module\", \"Refactor this class\", \"Move this to a separate file\"laravel-best-practiceslaravel1.7KApply this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or refactoring Laravel PHP code. This includes creating or modifying controllers, models, migrations, form requests, policies, jobs, scheduled commands, service classes, and Eloquent queries. Triggers for N+1 and query performance issues, caching strategies, authorization and security patterns, validation, error handling, queue and job configuration, route definitions, and architectural decisions. Also use for Laravel code reviews and refactoring exipr-triagextone1.7KPRの変更内容をトリアージし、変更カテゴリ分類・表層チェック・必要リファレンス判定を行います。結果を`.pr-triage.json`に出力し、後続のコードレビューフェーズで活用します。CI環境でのコスト最適化に使用してください。quality-playbookgithub1.6KRun a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-pupr-feedback-quality-gatenexu-io1.6KSafely track pull request feedback, resolve review comments or merge conflicts, validate fixes, and use a read-only cross-review before committing or pushing follow-up changes.design-code-architecturewondelai1.6KGuided journey from an app idea to a deliberate architecture: boundaries, domain model, data decisions, and resilience, making only the expensive-to-reverse decisions and deferring the rest. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, system-design, ddia-systems, software-design-philosophy, release-it, pragmatic-programmer, 37signals-way - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (ARCHITECTURE.md,clean-code-principlesasyrafhussin1.6KSOLID principles, design patterns, DRY, KISS, and clean code fundamentals. Use when reviewing architecture, checking code quality, refactoring, or discussing design decisions. Triggers on "review architecture", "check code quality", "SOLID principles", "design patterns", or "clean code".improve-code-qualitywondelai1.6KGuided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, system-design, ddia-systems - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.mdom-root-causeopen-mercato1.6KRead-only root-cause analysis for a tracker issue. Identifies the bug's location and the minimal change surface so the next agent can implement the fix without re-exploring the repo. Outputs a short summary, the files that need to change, and the proposed approach.remove-technical-debtwondelai1.6KGuided journey from a large aged codebase everyone fears to touch to one that is safe to change, legible, bounded, and resilient - paid down in place without a rewrite. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, refactoring-patterns, clean-code, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, domain-driven-design - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.flows-code-reviewcognitedata1.6KRun the technical (code) review step of Flows app certification in a local git app. Loads flows-review-checks for the actual bar, then writes artifacts under reviews/code-review/feedback-round-<N>/. Use when the user asks for a Flows code review, technical review, pre-submit review, app certification code review, or "run flows-code-review". Re-run until 0 open Must Fix items remain before moving on to flows-design-review.ruff-recursive-fixgithub1.6KRun Ruff checks with optional scope and rule overrides, apply safe and unsafe autofixes iteratively, review each change, and resolve remaining findings with targeted edits or user decisions.intended-vs-implementedphuryn1.6KThe method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented intent, what counts as implementation evidence, which mismatches matter, and how to avoid hand-wavy findings. Use when auditing AI-built code, reviewing access control against documented permissions, or checking whether a codebase matches its own documentation.code-simplifierpproenca1.6KCode simplification skill for improving clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving exact behavior. Use when simplifying code, reducing complexity, cleaning up recent changes, applying refactoring patterns, or improving readability. Triggers on tasks involving code cleanup, simplification, refactoring, or readability improvements.code-reviewadobe1.6KUse this when reviewing AEM Edge Delivery Services (EDS, Franklin, Helix) code, either self-review at the end of development before opening a PR, or reviewing an existing pull request. Validates block structure, CSS and JS patterns, DOM output, Lighthouse performance, and accessibility against EDS best practices, and posts findings as review comments or GitHub suggestions.