Code Review
863 skills.
Browse
code-review-analysisaj-geddes2.4KPerform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, or providing code improvement suggestions.understand-anything-knowledge-graphreason-machines2.4KTurn any codebase into an interactive knowledge graph using Claude Code skills — explore, search, and ask questions about any project visually.crap-scoredotnet2.4KCalculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) for a named .NET method, class, or file. USE FOR: explicit CRAP calculation or coverage-and-complexity risk within that named target, including which tests to prioritize. DO NOT USE FOR: project-wide coverage/CRAP, plateaus, or project-wide blockers/priorities (coverage-analysis); behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis); writing tests; test runs without CRAP context.dx-apexguru-scanforcedotcom2.4KRun an ApexGuru performance scan on a Salesforce Apex project via the ApexGuru SFAP Scan API. Zips the project's Apex (any layout), submits it, polls to completion, decodes the base64 report, and presents performance antipattern violations (SOQL in loop, DML in loop, Schema.getGlobalDescribe(), SOQL without WHERE/LIMIT, unused SOQL fields) grouped by rule with severity, file:line, and suggested fixes — clearly attributed as 'Static only' or 'Production insights'. TRIGGER when the user says 'run thermo-nuclear-reviewcursor2.4KComprehensive security and correctness audit of a branch's changes. Use for thermo nuclear, thermonuclear, or deep review requests, or branch/PR diff audits focused on bugs, breaking changes, security issues, devex regressions, and feature-gate leaks.qodo-get-rulesqodo-ai2.4KRetrieve and apply Qodo coding rules relevant to implementation, planning, refactoring, or code review. Use on "get rules", "load qodo rules", or "relevant standards" and when starting a concrete coding task. Reuse rules already retrieved for the same workspace, repository, and task scope; refresh when that scope changes.migrate-nullable-referencesdotnet2.3KEnable nullable reference types in a C# project and systematically resolve all warnings. USE FOR: adopting NRTs in existing codebases, file-by-file or project-wide migration, fixing CS8602/CS8618/CS86xx warnings, annotating APIs for nullability, cleaning up null-forgiving operators, upgrading dependencies with new nullable annotations. DO NOT USE FOR: projects already fully migrated with zero warnings (unless auditing suppressions), fixing a handful of nullable warnings in code that already has fusion-github-review-resolutionequinor2.3KResolves unresolved GitHub PR review threads end-to-end: evaluates whether each review comment is correct, applies a targeted fix when valid, replies with rationale when not, commits, and resolves the thread. USE FOR: unresolved review threads, PR review feedback, changes requested PRs, PR review URLs (#pullrequestreview-...), fix the review comments, close the open threads, address PR feedback. DO NOT USE FOR: summarizing feedback without code changes, creating new PRs, or read-only branches.fixreact2.3KUse when you have lint errors, formatting issues, or before committing code to ensure it passes CI.detect-static-dependenciesdotnet2.3KACTIVATION PREREQUISITE: the request or discovered target must explicitly identify C#, .NET, `.cs`, or `.csproj`; otherwise stay dormant without invoking this skill. USE FOR: locating System.DateTime.Now/UtcNow, System.IO.File/Directory, System.Environment, HttpClient, Console, or Process usage in C#; auditing C# code for hard-to-test framework dependencies; or verifying those C# calls are already abstracted. DO NOT USE FOR: any target lacking the activation prerequisite; generating wrappers (usjscpdkucherenko2.3KCopy-paste detector for 220+ languages. Detect exact, renamed and near-miss duplicated code, measure duplication percentages, and find refactoring hotspots with the codebase summary.cloud-design-patternsgithub2.3KCloud design patterns for distributed systems architecture covering 42 industry-standard patterns across reliability, performance, messaging, security, and deployment categories. Use when designing, reviewing, or implementing distributed system architectures.django-perf-reviewgetsentry2.3KDjango performance code review. Use when asked to "review Django performance", "find N+1 queries", "optimize Django", "check queryset performance", "database performance", "Django ORM issues", or audit Django code for performance problems.review-and-shipcursor2.3KReview the current branch for bugs, intent fit, and test coverage; run or write tests; commit focused work; open or update a PR.use-modern-gojetbrains2.3KUse the Modern Go Guidelines CLI whenever writing, modifying, fixing, or refactoring Go code. Apply its version-specific guidance to generated changes.merge-readyevery-app2.3KTake a branch from "code exists (or is about to)" to "ready for the maintainer's final review" — multi-axis subagent review with verified findings, fixes, ci:check, checkpoint commits, and an updated PR. Use whenever the user says a feature/fix/branch should be "merge ready", asks to get changes ready for review, or appends this to a build request ("build X and make it merge-ready").thread-abort-migrationdotnet2.3KGuides migration of .NET Framework Thread.Abort usage to cooperative cancellation in modern .NET. USE FOR: modernizing code that calls Thread.Abort, catching ThreadAbortException, replacing Thread.ResetAbort, replacing Thread.Interrupt for thread termination, resolving PlatformNotSupportedException or SYSLIB0006 after retargeting to .NET 6+, migrating ASP.NET Response.End or Response.Redirect(url, true) which internally call Thread.Abort. DO NOT USE FOR: code that only uses Thread.Join, Thread.Smaintain-verification-skillcursor2.2KPeriodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Use for /maintain-verification-skill or \"audit the verify skill\".tyastral-sh2.2KGuide for using ty, the extremely fast Python type checker and language server. Use this when type checking Python code or setting up type checking in Python projects.wp-guardamelnagdy2.2KReview generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaweb-design-guidelinesbytedance2.2KReview UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".experience-lwc-rtl-validateforcedotcom2.2KUse this skill to review a Lightning Web Component (.html, .js, .css files) for right-to-left (RTL) internationalization correctness, producing a finding list with code-level fixes covering CSS logical properties, bidirectional text handling, keyboard semantics, and RTL-aware SLDS class usage. TRIGGER when the user says \"review this LWC for RTL\", \"audit i18n compliance\", \"fix bidirectional text rendering\", \"replace left/right CSS with logical properties\", \"check RTL layout issues\", \"vsenior-architectsickn332.2KComplete toolkit for senior architect with modern tools and best practices.woo-guardamelnagdy2.2KReview generated or changed WooCommerce code — extensions, payment and shipping integrations, checkout customizations, and order/product logic — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WooCommerce APIs: wc_get_order, wc_get_orders, wc_get_product, WC() cart or session, woocommerce_* hooks, Store API endpoints, payment gateways, order or product meta, HPOS, subscriptions, or bookings. Use on 'review this Woo plugin', 'is this HPOS compatible', swiftui-view-refactordimillian2.2KRefactor and review SwiftUI view files with strong defaults for small dedicated subviews, MV-over-MVVM data flow, stable view trees, explicit dependency injection, and correct Observation usage. Use when cleaning up a SwiftUI view, splitting long bodies, removing inline actions or side effects, reducing computed `some View` helpers, or standardizing `@Observable` and view model initialization patterns.improve-reactmillionco2.2KSurvey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or acode-reviewxtone2.2KPRやコード変更の汎用コードレビューを実施します。コードの品質、セキュリティ、設計を共通基準で評価し、approve/rejectを判断します。「このPRをレビュー」「コードレビューして」「マージ前チェック」などの依頼や、gh pr viewコマンドの実行時に使用してください。wp-abilities-auditwordpress2.2KAudit a WordPress plugin's REST surface and produce a standardized audit document proposing Abilities API registrations. Produces a markdown doc with a YAML schema and prose sections that humans and agents can both consume when planning a registration rollout. Works on any WP plugin.no-mistakeskunchenguid2.2KValidate your code changes through the no-mistakes pipeline - automated code review, tests, lint, docs, push, PR, and CI - before they reach the configured push target. Use when the user asks to run no-mistakes, gate or ship or validate their changes, push safely, asks you to do a task and then validate it, or invokes /no-mistakes.nushell-prohustcer2.2KComprehensive Nushell scripting best practices, idioms, security, and evidence-driven code review. Use when writing, reviewing, auditing, debugging, or refactoring Nushell (.nu) scripts, modules, custom commands, pipelines, config, and tests. Also use for Bash/POSIX-to-Nushell conversion and Nu migration issues including custom completions, record-spread flags, YAML, SemVer, cleanup, and subprocess diagnostics.pr-review-canvascursor2.2KGenerate an interactive PR review walkthrough as an HTML page. Fetches PR data via gh API, categorizes files into core vs mechanical changes, adds reviewer annotations, and renders diffs with moved-code detection. Use when the user pastes a GitHub PR URL and asks for a review, walkthrough, or summary, or says "review this PR".migrate-static-to-wrapperdotnet2.2KALWAYS USE when asked to migrate, replace, or make testable existing C# static calls with a named wrapper or built-in abstraction: DateTime.UtcNow/Now or DateTimeOffset.UtcNow to TimeProvider/IClock, File.* to IFileSystem or an existing store such as ITextFileStore, and Environment.* to an existing reader such as IEnvironmentReader. Covers scoped files/projects, constructor injection, replacing temp-file or process-environment tests with fakes, "already registered" abstractions, and static classreview-teamcline2.2KUse when the user asks for a code review by a fleet of specialized reviewer agents, wants multiple independent reviewer perspectives, or asks to run reviewers in single-pass or iterative fix-until-clean mode. Launches focused subagents for correctness, security, architecture, conventions, simplicity, UX, reliability, telemetry, testing, compatibility, and documentation review.greploopgreptileai2.2KIteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-triggers review, and repeats. Use when the user wants to fully optimize a PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards.typescript-reviewmetabase2.2KReview TypeScript and JavaScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing TypeScript/JavaScript code.impl-validatorar9av2.1KValidate whether an implementation matches its stated goal. Use this skill when a skill or agent wants a second opinion on its own output, when the user says "check this implementation", "validate what you did", "is this correct?", "review the output", or "did you do this right?". Also spawned automatically as a subagent by other skills (memory-bridge, daily-update) to self-check their outputs before presenting to the user. Returns a structured pass/warn/fail verdict with specific actionable isswp-abilities-verifywordpress2.1KVerify a WordPress plugin's Abilities API registrations: enumerate abilities, check that callback behavior matches each annotation's claim (the adversarial readonly-but-writes detection), validate permissions and schemas, and validate audit documents produced by wp-abilities-audit.modern-csharp-coding-standardsaaronontheweb2.1KWrite modern, high-performance C# code using records, pattern matching, value objects, async/await, Span<T>/Memory<T>, and best-practice API design patterns. Emphasizes functional-style programming with C# 12+ features.ai-debt-detectorwshobson2.1KUse after generating code, after accepting AI suggestions, or when reviewing AI-written modules. Also use when code works but feels brittle, when error handling seems thin, when orphaned resources or missing cleanup are suspected, or when the agent claims done but hidden debt may exist. Catches the specific failure patterns AI agents produce that humans would not.difityoshiko-pg2.1KAsk the user for a code review by opening the changes in difit, a local diff viewer. Explicit opt-in only — use when the user names difit, asks to open or show the diff in the viewer, or has a standing instruction to request reviews through difit after changes. Do not use it for ordinary requests to review code, diffs, commits, branches, or pull requests.get-pr-commentscursor2.1KFetch and summarize review comments from the active pull requestfusion-code-conventionsequinor2.1KApplies and explains code conventions across TypeScript, React, C#, and Markdown. Enforces naming rules, file naming patterns, TSDoc and XML doc standards, inline comment intent (the *why*, not the *what*), code structure, error handling, async patterns, and dead code policy. Also enforces ADR and contributor doc decisions, and flags decisions that appear stale or misaligned with current tooling. USE FOR: convention questions, code review against project standards, applying naming rules, auditinom-auto-review-propen-mercato2.1KReview or re-review a PR by number in an isolated worktree. Runs the `om-code-review` skill — or, for spec-only design PRs, a specification review — submits approve/request-changes, manages pipeline labels. On changes-requested, the autofix loop (fix/test/validate/re-review until merge-ready) runs on the automation's own PRs or with --autofix; other authors' PRs get review + handoff only. Usage - /om-auto-review-pr <PR-number> [--autofix]skill-reviewsanyuan07042.1KQuality review and audit for Claude Code skills. Analyzes skill structure, description quality, workflow design, token efficiency, and anti-patterns against best practices. Use when user wants to review a skill, audit a skill, check skill quality, evaluate a skill, critique a skill, lint a skill, or validate a skill. Triggers: 'review skill', 'audit skill', 'skill quality', 'check my skill', 'evaluate skill', 'skill lint', 'validate skill', 'skill review', 'is this skill good', 'improve this skipr-review-commentsgiuseppe-trisciuoglio2.1KPosts review findings from a JSON file as inline comments on a GitHub Pull Request, attaching each comment to its file and line. Use when you have a list/JSON of review findings (each with a file path, line number, and a message such as summary/failure_scenario) and want them published on a PR as inline review comments. Triggers include "post these review comments on the PR", "associate comments to files in the PR", "publish review findings to PR #N", or having a JSON array of {file, line, summamaintain-greptile-rulesevery-app2KEvaluate verified findings from merge-ready, Greptile, pull-request, CI, security, billing, and other code reviews, then promote durable review gaps into the version-controlled .greptile configuration. Use when a review uncovers a recurring or high-risk repository invariant that Greptile does not capture, when Greptile repeatedly produces a false positive, or when asked to audit or update OpenSEO's Greptile rules and context.clean-architecturepproenca2KClean Architecture principles and best practices from Robert C. Martin's book. This skill should be used when designing software systems, reviewing code structure, or refactoring applications to achieve better separation of concerns. Triggers on tasks involving layers, boundaries, dependency direction, entities, use cases, or system architecture.setup-ts-deep-modulesvinvcn2K在 TypeScript repo 中接入 dependency-cruiser，让每个 package 成为 deep module：implementation 隐藏在 subfolders 中，只能通过 entry-point files 访问。User-invoked。fusion-dependency-reviewequinor2KReview dependency PRs with structured research, existing-PR-discussion capture, multi-lens analysis (security, code quality, impact), and a repeatable verdict template. USE FOR: dependency update PRs, Renovate/Dependabot PRs, library upgrade reviews, "review this dependency PR", "should we merge this update". DO NOT USE FOR: feature PRs, application code reviews, dependency automation/bot configuration, or unattended merge without confirmation.code-qualitycognitedata2KMUST be used whenever reviewing a Flows app for code quality, maintainability, or clean code issues — before a PR review, after a feature is complete, or when the user asks for a code review. Do NOT skip linting steps. Triggers: code quality, code review, clean code, refactor, maintainability, technical debt, any type, naming, dead code, duplication, DRY, single responsibility, component size, lint, linting, TypeScript strict, dependency injection, file structure.