Agent Skills

weekly-performance-digest

businesstradermonty2.1K installs

Generate a weekly performance summary from closed trader-memory-core theses — win rate, expectancy, profit factor, R-multiple, MAE/MFE, and win/loss pattern analysis by source skill, exit reason, thesis type, sector, and mechanism. No API required; pure local calculation.

Install

npx skills add https://github.com/tradermonty/claude-trading-skills --skill weekly-performance-digest
SKILL.md

Weekly Performance Digest

Overview

Weekly Performance Digest aggregates the trades you closed during a week into a single performance report. It reads CLOSED theses tracked by trader-memory-core (state/theses/th_*.yaml), computes headline metrics (win rate, expectancy, profit factor, R-multiple, MAE/MFE), breaks results down across several pattern dimensions (source skill, exit reason, thesis type, sector, mechanism tag, screening grade), and surfaces the week's biggest winners, losers, and lessons. Output is a JSON record plus a human-readable Markdown report. Pure calculation — no API key required.

When to Use

  • At the end of a trading week to review aggregate realized performance
  • To measure win rate and expectancy across all closed positions
  • To see which source skills, exit reasons, sectors, or mechanisms drove wins vs losses
  • To feed a month-end review (combine four weekly digests) or a postmortem
  • For a quick "what worked / what didn't" snapshot grounded in real closed trades

When Not to Use

  • For a single-trade deep review — use trade-performance-coach
  • For signal-level true/false-positive classification — use signal-postmortem
  • For buy/sell recommendations or position sizing — this skill is descriptive only

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+ with PyYAML (already a repo dependency)
  • A trader-memory-core state directory of thesis YAML files (state/theses/)
  • No API key required

Workflow

Step 1: Run the digest for a week

python3 skills/weekly-performance-digest/scripts/generate_weekly_digest.py \
  --state-dir state/theses \
  --from-date 2026-06-13 --to-date 2026-06-20 \
  --output-dir reports/ -v

Defaults: --state-dir state/theses, --from-date = 7 days before --to-date, --to-date = today, --output-dir reports/. With no date flags it digests the trailing 7 days.

Step 2: Read the report

The run writes reports/weekly_digest_<to-date>.json and reports/weekly_digest_<to-date>.md. Review the Markdown for the executive summary, metrics table, pattern breakdowns, and top winners/losers; consume the JSON downstream.

Step 3 (optional): Feed downstream

Combine several weekly JSON digests for a monthly review, or pass the JSON to a postmortem/coach step. The skill is descriptive — act on its findings via your normal review process.

How It Works

  • Trade selection. A trade counts in a week if its exit.actual_date falls in [from-date, to-date] and status == CLOSED.
  • Win/loss. outcome.pnl_dollars > 0 is a winner, < 0 a loser, == 0 breakeven; win_rate = winners / total_trades.
  • R-multiple. pnl_dollars / ((entry.actual_price − exit.stop_loss) × position.shares). (Stop-loss is read from exit.stop_loss, per the real thesis schema.)
  • Double-counting safeguard. A CLOSED thesis's outcome.pnl_dollars is the cumulative realized P&L across all trims plus the final leg. Headline metrics use that cumulative value over CLOSED theses only. The separate partial_trims block scans status_history[] of PARTIALLY_CLOSED theses only (still open) and is reported for information — it is never added into the headline totals/win-rate. A position trimmed in week 1 then closed in week 2 therefore shows as a partial trim in week 1 and inside week 2's CLOSED headline; that is intended, not a duplicate.

Output Format

JSON (weekly_digest_<to-date>.json)

{
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "report_type": "weekly_performance_digest",
  "period": {"from": "2026-06-13", "to": "2026-06-20"},
  "generated_at": "2026-06-20T21:39:07Z",
  "summary": {
    "total_trades": 2, "winners": 1, "losers": 1, "breakeven": 0,
    "win_rate": 0.5, "expectancy": 25.0, "profit_factor": 2.0,
    "total_realized_pnl": 50.0, "total_realized_pnl_pct": 4.17
  },
  "metrics": {
    "avg_winner": 100.0, "avg_loser": -50.0,
    "largest_winner": 100.0, "largest_loser": -50.0,
    "avg_holding_days_winners": 9.0, "avg_holding_days_losers": 6.0,
    "r_multiple_avg": 0.25, "r_multiple_stdev": 1.06,
    "avg_mae_pct": -3.75, "avg_mfe_pct": 4.5
  },
  "pattern_analysis": {
    "by_source_skill": {"...": {"wins": 1, "losses": 0, "total": 1, "win_rate": 1.0}},
    "by_exit_reason": {}, "by_thesis_type": {}, "by_sector": {},
    "by_mechanism_tag": {}, "by_screening_grade": {}
  },
  "partial_trims": {"count": 0, "total_realized_pnl": 0.0, "trims": []},
  "lessons": {"top_wins": [], "top_losses": [], "process_improvements": []}
}

Markdown (weekly_digest_<to-date>.md)

Sections: # Weekly Performance Digest, ## Executive Summary, ## Performance Metrics, ## Pattern Analysis, ## Lessons Learned (### Top Winners / ### Top Losers / ### Process Improvements).

An empty week still produces a valid report with zeroed metrics (exit code 0).

Resources

  • scripts/generate_weekly_digest.py — digest generator (JSON + Markdown)
  • references/weekly-digest-metrics.md — metric formulas and interpretation

Key Principles

  1. Closed trades only for headline numbers — cumulative outcome.*, keyed on exit date.
  2. No double-counting — partial trims are informational and excluded from totals.
  3. Pattern attribution — every win/loss is attributed across multiple dimensions.
  4. Descriptive, not prescriptive — the digest reports; you decide.

Related skills

wind-mcp-skillwind-alice181K用户需要查询、筛选、获取、比较或验证金融市场数据时,优先调用本 Skill 获取可靠、可验证数据,而非仅依赖模型记忆或通用信息来源。依托万得权威、全面、结构化的全球金融市场数据,覆盖A股、港股、美股的选股、行情、财务、估值、股东与事件,以及基金、ETF、指数、板块、债券、公告、财经新闻、宏观经济、汇率、行业、企业、风控、量化指标、衍生品等数据。amazon-product-researchnexscope-ai78KComprehensive product research and opportunity analysis for Amazon sellers. Analyzes demand, competition, profit potential, market entry barriers, and validates product ideas. Covers product sourcing, pricing strategy, and go-to-market planning. Use when the user asks about researching a product to sell, validating product ideas, product opportunity analysis, market research for Amazon, competition analysis, profit potential, should I sell this product, product viability, or any general product pricingcoreyhaines3166KWhen the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' 'should I offer a free plan,' 'pricing page teardown,' 'pricing page audit,' 'is my pricing page AI-readable,' or 'cacross-border-ecommercenexscope-ai63KCross-border e-commerce expansion advisor. Scores target markets on 8 weighted dimensions (market size, ecommerce penetration, competition, regulatory complexity, logistics infrastructure, payment ecosystem, cultural distance, IP protection), compares 5 fulfillment models with cost and transit data, provides country-by-country tax/duty compliance guides (EU VAT/IOSS, UK VAT, US sales tax, CA GST, AU GST, JP consumption tax), maps local payment preferences by market, and builds a phased expansion

Search skills and MCP servers

Fuzzy search across 23,137 skills and servers