review-changes
Perform a structured code review using change detection and impact
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/tirth8205/code-review-graph --skill review-changesSKILL.md
Review Changes
Review a change set with risk scores and blast radius from the knowledge graph.
Steps
- Call
detect_changes_toolfor risk-scored changed functions, test gaps and affected flows. - Call
get_affected_flows_toolonly when you need the steps of an affected flow. - For each high-risk function, call
query_graph_toolwithpattern="tests_for"to check test coverage. - Call
get_impact_radius_toolwhen the blast radius is not clear from step 1. - Suggest specific test cases for untested changes.
Output Format
Group findings by risk level (high, medium, low). For each finding give what changed and why it matters, its test coverage, and the suggested fix. End with a merge recommendation.
Token Efficiency Rules
- Call
get_minimal_context_tool(task="<your task>")before any other graph tool. - Pass
detail_level="minimal"wherever a tool accepts it. Use "standard" only when minimal is not enough. - Prefer a targeted
query_graph_toolcall over a broad listing call. - Budget: about five tool calls and 800 tokens of graph output per task.
- Read the implementation and its tests before changing code. The graph narrows scope; it does not replace the source.
Related skills
improve-codebase-architecturemattpocock1MScan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.codebase-designmattpocock691KShared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.web-design-guidelinesvercel-labs676KReview UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".code-reviewmattpocock631KReview the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".
