architecture-decision-records
Document technical decisions as Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) with context, options considered, and rationale.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills --skill architecture-decision-recordsSKILL.md
Architecture Decision Records
Document significant technical decisions so future you (and your team) understands why choices were made.
When to Write an ADR
Write one when you're making a decision that:
- Is hard to reverse later
- Affects multiple parts of the system
- Involves tradeoffs between valid options
- Will be questioned by someone in 6 months
Examples: choosing a database, adopting a framework, changing auth strategy, restructuring the API, adding a build tool.
Template
Create files in docs/decisions/ (or adr/) with sequential numbering:
# ADR-001: Use PostgreSQL for primary database
## Status
Accepted | Proposed | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXX
## Date
2026-04-10
## Context
What is the problem or situation that requires a decision?
Include constraints, requirements, and forces at play.
## Options Considered
### Option A: PostgreSQL
- Pros: ACID compliance, JSON support, mature ecosystem, free
- Cons: Requires managing connections, vertical scaling limits
### Option B: MongoDB
- Pros: Flexible schema, horizontal scaling
- Cons: No transactions across collections, eventual consistency issues
### Option C: PlanetScale (MySQL)
- Pros: Serverless, branching, managed
- Cons: Vendor lock-in, no foreign keys in their branching model
## Decision
We chose **PostgreSQL** because:
1. Our data is relational — users, teams, projects with clear relationships
2. We need ACID transactions for billing operations
3. JSON columns give us schema flexibility where needed
4. Prisma/Drizzle have excellent Postgres support
## Consequences
- We need to manage connection pooling (use PgBouncer or Prisma's built-in pool)
- Migrations must be backwards-compatible for zero-downtime deploys
- We accept vertical scaling limits and will shard later if needed
Workflow
- Identify the decision being made
- Research the options (at least 2-3 alternatives)
- Write the ADR using the template
- Review with the team (PR or discussion)
- Merge as accepted
- Reference from code comments when relevant:
// See ADR-001
File Naming
docs/decisions/
├── 001-use-postgresql.md
├── 002-adopt-trpc-over-rest.md
├── 003-switch-to-pnpm.md
└── template.md
Tips
- Keep ADRs short — 1-2 pages max
- Write them in the present tense ("We choose X" not "We chose X")
- It's OK to write an ADR after the fact if you forgot to write one during the decision
- Superseded ADRs should link to their replacement, not be deleted
- ADRs are not design docs — they capture the decision, not the full design
Related skills
domain-modelingmattpocock714KBuild and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a CONTEXT.md, or recording or editing an ADR.to-specmattpocock576KTurn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker: no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.caveman-helpjuliusbrussee369KQuick-reference card for caveman modes, skills and commands. Trigger: /caveman-help or "caveman help".pptxanthropics228KUse this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates (.potx), layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the u