principle-laziness-protocol
Apply when refactoring, evaluating diff size, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/cursor/plugins --skill principle-laziness-protocolSKILL.md
Laziness Protocol
Aim for the most result with the least code and complexity.
- Prefer deletion. When asked to refactor or improve, look for removals before additions.
- Maintain a flat call hierarchy. Avoid deep call chains. A rich interface that hides substantial work is not a deep call chain. If answering a question requires tracing through more than 3 files or layers, flatten it.
- Consolidate decisions. Do not repeat the same choice in several places. Put it behind one source of truth and pass the result as a simple flag.
- Minimize the diff. Make the smallest change that solves the problem. Fewer lines beat "elegant" boilerplate.
- Question the threading. If a task asks you to pass a new signal through types, schemas, pipelines, or similar layers, stop and look for a more direct path.
- Sweat the small leaks. Remove tiny pass-throughs, representation leaks, and duplicated choices before they spread. Small leaks compound into permanent coordination costs.
The test: If a human developer would find the code exhausting to maintain, it is a bad solution.
Related skills
improve-codebase-architecturemattpocock1MScan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.codebase-designmattpocock691KShared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.web-design-guidelinesvercel-labs676KReview UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".code-reviewmattpocock631KReview the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".