Agent Skills

security-scan

Deep security scanning for .NET applications across 6 layers: vulnerable packages, secrets detection, OWASP code patterns, auth configuration, CORS policy, and data protection. Produces severity-rated findings with specific remediation steps. Load this skill when: "security scan", "security audit", "check for vulnerabilities", "find secrets", "OWASP", "auth review", "CORS check", "security review", "penetration test prep", "CVE check", "vulnerability scan", "hardcoded password", "data protection

Install

npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill security-scan
SKILL.md

/security-scan — 6-Layer Security Pipeline

What

Runs a defense-in-depth static scan across 6 layers. A project with zero CVEs can still have hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, and missing auth — each layer catches a different vulnerability class. Findings map to the OWASP Top 10:2025 taxonomy and are rated Critical/High/Medium/Low by exploitability, impact, and exposure — a Critical SQL injection on a public endpoint outranks a Low info-disclosure on an admin page.

Detection patterns, OWASP mappings, remediation code, and the report template live in references/scan-layers.md — read it before executing.

Honesty rule: this is static analysis, not a penetration test. It catches known patterns but misses business-logic flaws, complex authorization bypasses, and runtime-only vulnerabilities. Every report states this.

When

  • Pre-release security gate — full scan, non-negotiable before production
  • "Security scan", "security audit", "find secrets", "CVE check", "OWASP"
  • After a dependency update (Layer 1), auth changes (Layer 4), config changes (Layer 2), or logging changes (Layer 6)
  • Pre-pentest preparation — fix static issues before paying for a pentest
  • Incident response and quarterly reviews

How

Step 1: Choose Layers

Scenario Layers
Pre-release gate / pentest prep / incident / quarterly All 6
After dependency update 1
New endpoint added 3, 4, 5
Auth system changes 4
Config file changes 2
Logging changes 6
Public API exposure 3, 4, 5
Internal-only service 1, 2, 3

Step 2: Execute the Layers

Read references/scan-layers.md for the detection patterns per layer. Delegate deep auth and secrets review to the security-auditor agent, pairing the authentication and configuration skills.

# Layer OWASP 2025 Method
1 Package vulnerabilities A03 Supply Chain dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive
2 Secrets detection — Pattern scan over .cs/.json/.yml/.xml/.config
3 OWASP code patterns A05 Injection, A08 Integrity, A04 Crypto, A01 Access Control Source scan: raw SQL, Html.Raw, BinaryFormatter, MD5/SHA1, IDOR
4 Auth configuration A07 Authentication, A01 Access Control get_endpoint_map — every route's auth posture in one call; flag unmarked endpoints; then JWT validation settings
5 CORS policy A02 Misconfiguration Wildcard origins, credentials combos, method/header breadth
6 Data protection A04 Crypto, A09 Logging & Alerting PII in logs, over-broad responses, plaintext sensitive storage

Step 3: Rate with Context

Severity must match actual risk — over-classification causes alert fatigue and buries the real Critical:

  • Test-fixture "secrets" and appsettings.Development.json values are expected — skip or mark INFO, don't flag as HIGH
  • A missing XML comment is never a security finding
  • Reserve Critical for exploitable-now issues: injection on public endpoints, exposed production secrets, auth bypass

Step 4: Report

Every finding: [SEVERITY] file:line — title, OWASP category, what's wrong, impact if exploited, and remediation code (before/after). Produce the summary table + per-layer status table from the reference template, prefixed with the static-analysis disclaimer.

Example

User: /security-scan before we ship

Claude: Running all 6 layers...

| Layer | Status | Findings |
|-------|--------|----------|
| 1. Packages | PASS | 0 CVEs (142 packages incl. transitive) |
| 2. Secrets | PASS | 0 real secrets (2 dev-only values skipped) |
| 3. OWASP Patterns | FAIL | 1 SQL injection |
| 4. Auth Config | WARN | 2 endpoints missing explicit auth attributes |
| 5. CORS | PASS | Explicit origins from configuration |
| 6. Data Protection | WARN | Customer email logged at Information level |

[HIGH] SearchOrders.cs:34 — SQL Injection (A05:2025)
  FromSqlRaw($"...LIKE '%{search}%'") → attacker controls the query.
  Fix: db.Orders.Where(o => EF.Functions.Like(o.Name, $"%{search}%"))

[MEDIUM] OrderEndpoints.cs:18,31 — no [Authorize]/[AllowAnonymous]; behavior
  depends on ambient global policy. Make intent explicit per endpoint.

[LOW] OrderPlacedHandler.cs:22 — PII in logs (A09:2025). Log CustomerId, not email.

Note: static analysis only — this does not replace a penetration test.

Related

  • references/scan-layers.md — detection patterns, OWASP 2025 mappings, report template
  • /verify — Phase 5 runs a lightweight version of this scan per change set
  • /health-check — Dimension 7 (Security Posture) is the spot-check version
  • authentication / configuration — remediation patterns for Layers 4 and 2

Related skills

azure-compliancemicrosoft606KRun Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.firebase-security-rules-auditorfirebase124KAudits Firebase (Firestore, Cloud Storage) security rules for vulnerabilities, privilege escalation, role bypasses, create vs update inconsistencies, resource exhaustion, type safety, size limits, and hasOnly ownership checks. Use when auditing/reviewing rules, running red-team rule assessments, or scoring against auditor checklists. Don't use for Firebase CLI (login, deploy), Auth, Crashlytics, Remote Config, or database queries.browser-fingerprint-auditliarjsdev69KAudit a browser fingerprint for internal contradictions with the liarjs CLI - canvas, WebGL, WebGL2, WebGPU, audio, 220 fonts, WebRTC and timezone probes, scored against the TLS/HTTP/ASN view of the same request. Use when asked to run a browser fingerprint test, see what a fingerprint looks like, check canvas or WebGL fingerprint stability, compare a spoofed profile against a real browser, or find out whether a browser profile is self-consistent.cloudflare-onecloudflare66KDesign, configure, troubleshoot, or review Cloudflare One Zero Trust and SASE deployments. Use cloudflare-one-migrations for migration planning from other vendors.

Search skills and MCP servers

Fuzzy search across 23,137 skills and servers