m02-resource
CRITICAL: Use for smart pointers and resource management. Triggers: Box, Rc, Arc, Weak, RefCell, Cell, smart pointer, heap allocation, reference counting, RAII, Drop, should I use Box or Rc, when to use Arc vs Rc, 智能指针, 引用计数, 堆分配
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/actionbook/rust-skills --skill m02-resourceSKILL.md
Resource Management
Layer 1: Language Mechanics
Core Question
What ownership pattern does this resource need?
Before choosing a smart pointer, understand:
- Is ownership single or shared?
- Is access single-threaded or multi-threaded?
- Are there potential cycles?
Error → Design Question
| Error | Don't Just Say | Ask Instead |
|---|---|---|
| "Need heap allocation" | "Use Box" | Why can't this be on stack? |
| Rc memory leak | "Use Weak" | Is the cycle necessary in design? |
| RefCell panic | "Use try_borrow" | Is runtime check the right approach? |
| Arc overhead complaint | "Accept it" | Is multi-thread access actually needed? |
Thinking Prompt
Before choosing a smart pointer:
What's the ownership model?
- Single owner → Box or owned value
- Shared ownership → Rc/Arc
- Weak reference → Weak
What's the thread context?
- Single-thread → Rc, Cell, RefCell
- Multi-thread → Arc, Mutex, RwLock
Are there cycles?
- Yes → One direction must be Weak
- No → Regular Rc/Arc is fine
Trace Up ↑
When pointer choice is unclear, trace to design:
"Should I use Arc or Rc?"
↑ Ask: Is this data shared across threads?
↑ Check: m07-concurrency (thread model)
↑ Check: domain-* (performance constraints)
| Situation | Trace To | Question |
|---|---|---|
| Rc vs Arc confusion | m07-concurrency | What's the concurrency model? |
| RefCell panics | m03-mutability | Is interior mutability right here? |
| Memory leaks | m12-lifecycle | Where should cleanup happen? |
Trace Down ↓
From design to implementation:
"Need single-owner heap data"
↓ Use: Box<T>
"Need shared immutable data (single-thread)"
↓ Use: Rc<T>
"Need shared immutable data (multi-thread)"
↓ Use: Arc<T>
"Need to break reference cycle"
↓ Use: Weak<T>
"Need shared mutable data"
↓ Single-thread: Rc<RefCell<T>>
↓ Multi-thread: Arc<Mutex<T>> or Arc<RwLock<T>>
Quick Reference
| Type | Ownership | Thread-Safe | Use When |
|---|---|---|---|
Box<T> |
Single | Yes | Heap allocation, recursive types |
Rc<T> |
Shared | No | Single-thread shared ownership |
Arc<T> |
Shared | Yes | Multi-thread shared ownership |
Weak<T> |
Weak ref | Same as Rc/Arc | Break reference cycles |
Cell<T> |
Single | No | Interior mutability (Copy types) |
RefCell<T> |
Single | No | Interior mutability (runtime check) |
Decision Flowchart
Need heap allocation?
├─ Yes → Single owner?
│ ├─ Yes → Box<T>
│ └─ No → Multi-thread?
│ ├─ Yes → Arc<T>
│ └─ No → Rc<T>
└─ No → Stack allocation (default)
Have reference cycles?
├─ Yes → Use Weak for one direction
└─ No → Regular Rc/Arc
Need interior mutability?
├─ Yes → Thread-safe needed?
│ ├─ Yes → Mutex<T> or RwLock<T>
│ └─ No → T: Copy? → Cell<T> : RefCell<T>
└─ No → Use &mut T
Common Errors
| Problem | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Rc cycle leak | Mutual strong refs | Use Weak for one direction |
| RefCell panic | Borrow conflict at runtime | Use try_borrow or restructure |
| Arc overhead | Atomic ops in hot path | Consider Rc if single-threaded |
| Box unnecessary | Data fits on stack | Remove Box |
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better |
|---|---|---|
| Arc everywhere | Unnecessary atomic overhead | Use Rc for single-thread |
| RefCell everywhere | Runtime panics | Design clear ownership |
| Box for small types | Unnecessary allocation | Stack allocation |
| Ignore Weak for cycles | Memory leaks | Design parent-child with Weak |
Related Skills
| When | See |
|---|---|
| Ownership errors | m01-ownership |
| Interior mutability details | m03-mutability |
| Multi-thread context | m07-concurrency |
| Resource lifecycle | m12-lifecycle |
Related skills
typescript-advanced-typeswshobson81KMaster TypeScript's advanced type system including generics, conditional types, mapped types, template literals, and utility types for building type-safe applications. Use when implementing complex type logic, creating reusable type utilities, or ensuring compile-time type safety in TypeScript projects.golang-code-stylesamber43KGolang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).golang-error-handlingsamber42KIdiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops` skill; fgolang-design-patternssamber41KIdiomatic Golang design patterns — functional options, constructor APIs, `init()` and global-state avoidance, enums, panic vs error decisions, resource management and lifecycle, graceful shutdown, timeouts and retries, streaming and iterators, and architecture styles (clean, hexagonal, DDD, flat). Apply when choosing between architectural patterns, implementing functional options, designing constructor APIs, setting up graceful shutdown, applying resilience patterns, or asking which idiomatic Go